The Insurance Sector.

The insurance sector must take the leaders role in financial services. If insurance is more comprehensible, to the public, more of them will avail of its service. The Indian government, must allow, and encourage, more transparent, and open communication, between the insurance firms, and their clients, and prospective clients, and vice versa. Business Schools must not be seen to be imparters of knowledge, resembling Rocket Science. Those that practice business, and those that percieve business taking place, must be encouraged by their observances.
If The 'Common Man' in India, is made a client of the insurance business, then the semi charitable hospitals will be able to take care of the destitute, and those suffering from penury, more effectively. To facilitate this process more effectively, the process of insurance, must undergo an observance, of a continuous nature, by those who practice the business. The public may be interracted with, on a regular basis, so that their needs are known, more comprehensively, by the insurance firms. The insurance firms are, after all, a part of the public domain, in its entirety of functioning, and must be seen to be a helper of the nation, by the common people, even more so than is being done, at the present time.

Action Without Motive.

In Hinduism, action without motive, is the highest ideal, because, it is believed, that one follows, the highest ideal, that god has created, for man. This is an extremely difficult ideal to conceptualise, because, we imagine for ourselves, before or during the work, on our performance of the work. In reality, we are performing work without motive, because God made creation, without motive. We work without motive, but imagine, that we do, due to our perceptions. That is the message of the Gita. The Lord says, 'Take refuge in me, and I will deliver you from all sins'.

Life

In my opinion, species propagate, so that they can learn about themselves, from others. The desire for self knowledge, makes a species want to propagate. Because this desire was so strong in our ancestors, is the reason that the procreational act affords so much pleasure. Man can in my opinion realise this because he functions differently from other species, because he is less dependent on his physical characteristics. The mind of the human being developed more rapidly than his body, and also more rapidly than the minds of ordinary animals, because man, being physically less adept than other species, had to depend upon the mind, for functioning. The Human being, for survival, has to follow ethical codes, because this sets him apart from animals. If he does not, then he becomes the weakest, and most dangerous of animals, due to his physical frailty. Before the origin of the desire for knowledge, there was no knowledge, and That Power, is God. Normally, when a species should have the propogative urge, to duplicate itself, pain should be the result. Because this urge for self knowledge is so strong, the brain interprets intense pain as intense pleasure. The higher a species evolves, the more intense is this pleasure. The sexual propagative interest in the opposite sex may just be a path towards better self knowledge, embarked upon by an individual living being. Please comment on my blog posting.

The Meeting of Thought.

In the 'civilised', world, litigation is increasing. People are looking to the courts, to settle even differences, where most would not go to the courts, to litigate in the past. This is due to a perception of civilisation, and uncivilisation, between those that have a liberal, and those that have a fundametalist outlook. It seems that there is no 'middle path', of ideas and thought, on the globe, between the liberal, and the fundamentalist thought. This is carried up to the governmental level. Those, whom consider themselves to be extremely liberal, may even accuse their own government, in court, who represent themselves! It seems that conflict is fashionable, or in 'Vogue', as the word represents. Everyone thinks, that it is apt to think, that, the world is one of continuous and unceasing conflict, where one has to rise, not with everyone else, but by stifling the voices of others, whether, they be fundamentalist, or liberal. Mr Bush may not represent, the most common line of thought, in the United States, on how the administration should be governed, due to the 'litigation' syndrome. In the United States, as is also true for the rest of the world, ideas, and opinion, as I have pointed out, may be polarised, or at least, may be different, like between the Democrats, and Republicans(though in this case, not radically). The American Constitution, in my humble opinion, was not made, with conflict in mind. All citizens of that great country, have equal, and honorable privileges, but how different can be their thought! I viewed a CNN programme, in which a young muslim lady was adamant, in wearing the Hijab, though it may not please all. In my opinion, laws, and policies, should be made, not by a minority, and majority, vote, or by litigation, but by a meeting, or merging, of the minority, and majority, thought, with the privilege of each to keep their identity distinct, via a benign view towards each other. This is the way, all effective laws are made, not by litigation, if I may point out to Mr Ahmedinejad, and to Mr Bush.