Saturday, April 03, 2010

How should the government overcome the Naxal movement?

The government represents the Naxals, also, since the Naxals stay in the territory of India. How has it come to pass, that in the heartland of India, the people have decided that the government does not represent them? If the forests and rivers, which are the sustenance of the tribals, are sold to multi-national companies, then the government represents the interests of the rich, and does not represent the poor of India. Can the government guarantee that the tribals will be rehabilitated? Has the government rehabilitated the many millions of poor people in India? How does Mr Chidambaram stay in a government bungalow, and have the trappings of power, and represent the poor of India? Does he feel as do the poor of India? He makes the excuse, that the trappings of power are the prerequisites of the government. Then what are the prerequisites of the tribals, and the poor of India? Does the government of India, really represent the poor? Why do the poor not care about the government's writ over India, or why does the tribal not care about the writ of the government? Also, Mr Chidambaram is from a mercantile background, before he joined politics. Does he see the matters of governance, from the point of view of commercial development? The rich do not need Mr Chidambaram, and yet he assists the rich, and does not assist the poor. The government will have to take some hard decisions, and may have to rollback on certain policies, which benefit commercialism. Otherwise, the government will find the unenviable position of fighting the poor, who are resisting big corporate houses. Then the government of India, will be fighting India.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home