The debate over Arunachal Pradesh.

First of all, what is the present position of Indian and Chinese Troops in Arunachal Pradesh? Why is the present position so? What is our argument for or against it? We share a proximity of culture and border with The People's Republic of China. We have been active in works on our side of the border. The Dalai Lama is a guest of India, out of his own accord, just as India and China, exist, out of their own accord, on certain principles of existence. He chooses to dwell in India. He does not subscribe to an armed struggle. In other words, he does not see himself as a Chinese citizen, yet. The Indian constitution allows any persona, to identify with or without any state, including India. It would be good for India to have a stable China, as a friendly neighbor. The Dalai Lama will not destabilize Tibet, he does not want it to happen. It is in the interest of India, and China, to have a non volatile population at the border. India does not but have the best wishes for China, and it is in the interest of Tibet to benefit from China, in any which way it can. It is in the interest of China, Tibet, India, and all her people, that we are in no debate over the border. The dispute is due to perceived grievances which may or may not be a fact of logic.